Old and Classy or New and Sexy?

New season of Mad Ants basketball means a new season of Buckets and Bottles, whether you like it or not. Here's my goal for the year: shorten these bad boys. The problem, though, is that I tend to get on stream of consciousness rants and out pours a 1,500 word article that no one (including me) really wants to read. Let's see if I can stick to my new philosophy. Here we go...

Watching this Celtics-Heat game and seeing the older Boston squad systematically dismantle the younger, sexier Heat reminds me of the difference I'm noticing between last night's Chianti and tonight's Pinot Noir. The C's know all the veteran moves and have all the savvy that the Heat lack, just as the Chianti - made by an ancient Italian winery - shows all the touches of pedigree and class that the California Pinot does not.

I probably sound like a pompous ass commenting on pedigree and class (see how I can rhyme?), but there's truth to what I say. The Pinot - incidentally made by Robert Mondavi - is mass produced and shows no evidence of effort to create quality wine, whereas the Chianti is smooth, complex and made as if it were an artist's chef d'ouevre. The flavors of the Pinot are simple and flabby - cherries, raspberries, smoke, tobacco and leather tasting like they've all been jammed together. The Chianti, however, has flavors that go on for days - the layers of flavors are readily discernible and you could spend ten minutes just picking out the dozens of different flavors.

I say this not to imply that the Mondavi isn't perfectly drinkable, but rather to point out that there is a giant difference between boutique wines that you have to search for and mass-produced and creatively marketed bottles that you can grab for $9 at the grocery store. There's no reason to turn your nose up at a $9 bottle, but on occasion it's worth the splurge to get into a $30+ bottle that's been hand-crafted by a winemaker with years of experience in the trade.

Similarly, while we all get caught up in the hype surrounding the Heat, it's only a fool who gives up on a Celtics team that carries a minimum of four Hall of Fame players who have been honing their trade for many years in the League.

Chardonnay. Great for Lobster.

Another fine Mad Ants win the other day against the Maine Red Claws. We can't seem to beat anyone else this season, but we simply own these guys and they are one of the top teams in the D-League. Perhaps we simply match up well against them, or more likely the Red Claws chronically underestimate us. Assuming the latter, I'd like to discuss a wine varietal that is also often underestimated (and coincidentally pairs perfectly with lobster!): chardonnay.

Too often I hear wine drinkers say, "I am not a fan of chardonnay because they are all too rich and buttery for me." Though many California wineries end up with buttery chardonnays that are loaded with yeast and oak flavors, the grape is actually one of the most versatile, if not the most versatile varietal on the planet. With varied winemaking techniques, chardonnay can be light and refreshing, deep and complex, fruit-forward or even find itself made into a sparkling wine.

To create the butter bombs for which they are famous, California winemakers use three techniques: new oak barrels, malolactic fermentation and aging the wine on its lees. Aging chardonnay in oak barrels is no different than wineries in Burgundy or Washington State; however, by using relatively new oak barrels, Californians ensure that their wines are imparted with a strong oak flavor. By contrast, Burgundian and Washington chardonnays are aged on older oak that will give them a more mellow flavor.

The second technique California wineries use is malolactic fermentation, which is a second fermentation that converts malic acid (which gives some wines a sharper acidity) to lactic acid (which is much softer and smoother). This second fermentation often lends a softer and more full-bodied mouthfeel to the wine. Malolactic fermentation is common in red wines, but its use with white wines depends on the region. Again, many French and Washington wineries use this technique, but in varying degrees.

The final technique used by California winemakers to give their chardonnay its distinctive buttery taste is to age their wines on the lees. Lees are the dead yeast left after fermentation. While most wines are separated from the lees before they are aged, some wines, such as many California chardonnays, are left to age with the lees so that they take on a strong yeasty flavor.

In contrast to California, other wine growing regions do not often use all of the above techniques, though they will use one or two of them. Washington State wineries, for example, use malolactic fermentation but do not often use new oak barrels and do not often age their wines on the lees. As a result, Washington chardonnay typically has a brighter, more fruity taste to it.

Australia also uses some malolactic fermentation, but many Australian wineries use no oak at all on their wines, instead choosing to age them in steel vats. Such chardonnays are marketed as "unoaked" or "naked" chardonnays and with their bright citrus flavors are more similar to sauvignon blanc than to buttery California chardonnay.

While much of this is more than you need to know about chardonnay, the important take-away from this post is that chardonnay is no simple wine. Depending on the region from which your chardonnay comes, you are likely to find a style of chardonnay to fit any meal or occasion. Unoaked chardonnays from Australia (note that I am generalizing the regions here, and you should be able to find unoaked chardonnay from every chardonay-growing region in the world) are great for warm summer evenings, and even rival vinho verde in their refreshing qualities. Rich and buttery chardonnays from California make for great food pairings with white-sauce dishes. Washington and Burgundian chardonnays, with their soft mouthfeel and bright fruit flavors often pair very well with salads.

If you are one of the many winedrinkers who underestimate chardonnay, take my word for it and crack a few bottles from different regions. It may take a few tries to experience all of the different types, as wineries using malolactic fermentation and aging their wines on the lees will not mention this on the label. Unoaked wines, however, will often shout loudly about it, so you can either read the labels yourself or ask the wine steward or sommelier for an unoaked bottle.

Spring day means Vinho Verde!

It's game day in Fort Wayne - Mad Ants v. Maine Red Claws - but what's really important is the sunny 60 degrees that is going on outside. I like to think of myself as fairly hardy when it comes to winter weather, but Fort Wayne winters are particularly tortuous. Needless to say, today's sunshine is a welcome respite.

So, with the sun beaming through my office window, I want to talk about a great warm weather wine - Vinho Verde. Although its name literally means "green wine", it can actually be a red or a white wine, with whites made from Albario, Loureiro or Trajadura grapes being the best representatives of the class. Rather than referencing the color of the wine, "green" refers to the relatively young age at which these wines are made to drink - typically within the first year after bottling. As a result of their youthfulness, vinho verde wines have a very light and fresh taste that works well as an aperitif on a summer day (or on a 60 degree day that feels like summer because it's been 5 months since you've seen the sun).

In addition to being a great tasting wine, it doesn't hurt that vinho verdes are quite inexpensive, with most bottles falling in the $8-12 range. My favorite bottle is from Broadbent, a widely available bottle that retails for around $11. The highly level of acidity and the bright citrus flavors of this wine are perfect for grilled lime chicken and fresh summer vegetables, like radishes and cucumbers. Combine this wine with that meal, add a sunny day and some friends on the patio and you've got a great thing going on.

Not my usual detail for a blog, but vinho verde's simple pleasures aren't cut out for a long-winded explanation. Simply wait for the sunshine, pop a cork (or twist a screw) and enjoy. In the meantime, I'm going to go sit in the sun for a few minutes before I head over to get ready for tonight's game.

Nuts and Bolts. Nuts and Bolts.

Mad Ants down by 1 with the ball and 1:30 left in the game. Rob Kurz drives the lane and gets hammered. No call. Sean Sonderleiter reaches in on the rebound and is whistled for a foul. In frustration, Rob protests the call emphatically, but in no way challenges the referee directly. Oversensitive referee calls a technical foul. Reno hits the technical free throw, then hits the two free throws from Sonderleiter's foul to go up 4. Momentum is lost and so is the game: Reno 94, Mad Ants 90. It has not been often in the past three years that referees' calls have directly cost us games, but this one was egregious in the extreme.

As frustrating as the call was, there is no better time for me to get a bit more in-depth about SCREW caps. When I last mentioned screw caps, I was discussing how some new world wineries are breaking away from the centuries-old practice of stopping wine bottles with cork by using alternative closures, such as screw caps or synthetic corks. This break from tradition is necessary because corks have a 5-10% failure rate, resulting in lost profits for wineries and higher prices for consumers (to offset those lost profits).

New world wineries, especially those in Australia and New Zealand, have been at the forefront of these changes for several years now because their cork failure rates are on average higher than any other wine-growing region in the world. This high failure rate is not a simple case of bad luck. Wine corks are made from cork trees grown primarily in Portugal and Sardinia, Italy, meaning that European wineries have the first opportunity to choose the best corks. American wineries then get to choose, followed by South African and South American wineries and finally Australian and New Zealand wineries. There are exceptions to this order where individual wineries have negotiated contracts with cork producers, but by and large Australia and NZ wineries get the short end of the stick. Having last pick at cork each year means that these wineries have failure rates hovering at 10% and above.

To overcome this disadvantage, winemakers in Australia began experimenting with screw caps well over ten years ago. While they found that screw caps greatly reduced their wines' failure rates, they ran into a whole new problem: wine consumers have for decades associated screw caps with cheap wines such as Boone's Farm and Thunderbird. Furthermore, they discovered that many consumers considered the romance of pulling a cork out of a bottle to be essential to enjoying a bottle of wine.

While these challenges have been daunting, they have not been insurmountable. The use of screw caps has spread across the New World and is now even discovering limited acceptance by some European wineries. Consumers are also beginning to embrace this new technology, as the confidence of knowing a bottle will not be tainted is beginning to outweigh the romance of using a corkscrew.

Still, there remains much distance to travel before screw tops are widely accepted, and there is still a very large question as to how wines age when under screw. Corks allow for a minute amount of air transfer as a wine ages, contributing to a wine "maturing." Screw caps, however, do not allow any air to pass into the wine, theoretically limiting the amount of maturing that can occur. Still, there has not been enough research done into this question to deliver a firm answer and many wineries appear willing to accept that risk.

I also mentioned another alternative closure - synthetic cork. A short while ago, before screw caps became all the rage, it appeared that synthetic cork would emerge as the alternative closure of choice for wineries. It was thought to have none of cork's failure issues, while still maintaining the romance of popping a cork. As time has passed, however, synthetic cork has proven to be more susceptible to wine taint than previously thought and consumers have been averse to plastic in their wine bottles.

With synthetic corks on the way out, and with more wineries adopting screw caps in lieu of natural cork every year, it appears that wine consumers will have no choice but to discard their prejudices against screw caps and learn to love twisting a bottle open instead of uncorking it.

As for me, I am going to get over my griping against the officiating and unscrew the cap on a bottle of appropriately named Bitch wine, a grenache from Australia.

Old Vines and an Old Zag

Although the season has not gone exactly as planned, we had a welcome development the other day: Dan Dickau - he of the floppy hair and Gonzaga pedigree - signed with the D-League and we promptly traded Kyle McAlarney to the Springfield Armor for Dan's rights. Certainly Kyle was a favorite of our front office - a great kid and a mean 3-point shooter - but Dan is a floor general who can control the tempo of the game and has great court vision. Add in the veteran savvy that he has picked up over the course of 6 NBA seasons, and he has just the combination of skills we need to make the best of this team's talents. Sure enough, the first two games he started were decisive Mad Ants victories, coming in back-to-back games against the Erie Bayhawks.

In honor of Dan's arrival, I grabbed a bottle of 2006 Old Vine Zinfandel from the Klinker Brick Winery in Lodi, California - www.klinkerbrickwinery.com - at my new favorite bottle shop, Belmont Beverage, for about $16. The significance of this bottle is certainly not the Brick in the winery's name - which would be much more suitable if I was talking about our 2007 center, Larry Turner, instead of Dan. Rather, I chose this bottle because Dan's veteran savvy on the basketball court can be analogized to the complex characteristics that grapes grown on old vines contribute to a wine.

"Old vine" is a term used on wine labels to convey to the consumer that the grapes used for the wine were grown on mature vines. Most grape vines can live for 120 or so years, with their yields declining after the first 20 years. These declining yields make for not only smaller numbers of grapes, but smaller berries and fewer clusters, meaning more concentrated flavors, sugar and color. True to form, wines made from old vines are unbelievably good: they are rich and complex and make you feel like you should be chewing your wine instead of drinking it. Of course, less grapes per plant means less bottles produced means higher prices for you, so do not expect to pay less than $15 or so for old vine wines.

There are exceptions to that rule, and therein lies the problem with old vine wines: there are no legally defined specifications to determine what an "old vine" is. While most wineries seem to apply that term only when their vines are 50+ years old, certain shrewd (unscrupulous?) wineries have harnessed the growing consumer enthusiasm for old vine wines and have begun to apply that term to wines that are from significantly younger vines and do not have old vine characteristics. Unfortunately, as consumers we do not have many protections against purchasing these faux old vine wines. The best tips I can give are to 1) avoid large wineries with sophisticated marketing departments and 2) if a winery produces two or more zinfandels and they have an old vine zinfandel listed separately in their product line, then you should be safe.

As for the Klinker Brick, it was definitely in the category of Legitimate Old Vine Zinfandel. Deep color, huge nose and a finish that seemed to carry on for days. If you want to get a feel for old vine zinfandel at its best - and at an affordable price - this wine is a great option.

Cold as Ice

Another loss the other night to Rio Grande Valley. Like Iowa, they are unreasonably good, so I was not particularly depressed at the outcome. The rough part of this game, rather, was that a winter storm descended upon Fort Wayne, causing radio stations to say things like, "there is nothing going on tonight that you should be on the roads for. Stay home." Perfect. Thanks for that. Fortunately, we still had quite a few hardy souls who braved the weather to get to the Coliseum to see RGV systematically dismantle us.

Result and crowd aside, the brutal weather inspired me to write about a wine that holds a very unique niche in the wine world: ice wine. Ice wine is a member of the dessert wine family, along with late harvest wines, botrytis wines and an assortment of other wines with a high residual sugar (the sugar left in the wine after fermentation) content. All of these wines are delicious when served as dessert, but ice wine is particularly coveted by wine drinkers.

Ice wine is made when white grapes (often Vidal grapes) are left on the vine until the first hard freeze occurs, sometimes several weeks or even several months after other grapes are harvested. Two major things occur when grapes are left on the vines so long. First, ripening grapes produce sugar, meaning that the longer the grapes are left on the vine, the higher their sugar content. This is why "late harvest" wines are also classified as dessert wines. Second, and more unique to ice wines, the hard freeze causes all of the water in the grape to freeze, meaning that pressing the grapes produces a more concentrated juice that is akin to liquid sugar.

As simple and romantic as that explanation is, the truth is that producing ice wine is fraught with financial peril for the winemaker. If a freeze does not come soon enough, the grapes may rot on the vine, meaning the potential loss of an entire vintage for a winery. Of course, as with wineries that use cork, the risk of loss is passed along to you in the form of outrageous prices for many ice wines. Indignation aside, I believe that ice wines are worth every penny and I will go out of my way to get my hands on them.

Although I have not yet blogged much about wine and food pairing, it is important to highlight my comment from the opening paragraph that sweet wines are delicious when served as dessert. Sweet wines are a great way to wash down a meal, but their sweetness does not make for good pairing with sweet desserts. The combination of residual sugar, naturally sweet alcohol and acidity ends up clashing with the dessert's sweetness and neither the wine nor the dessert will show their best.

Any Port in a Storm

Remember how I said in my last blog that we are 0-6 against Iowa? Make it 0-7. Iowa is good - and by "good" I mean they could beat the Nets and the Bobcats right now. Still, I was expecting us to show a little grit and win at least one of those seven. No such luck. Instead, we now sit at 10-17, hoping to climb back into the playoff picture.

After witnessing our lack of fortitude the past several games, I decided to search for solace in one of my favorite types of wine: Port. Port is a fortified wine, meaning that it has distilled spirits added to it (roughly equivalent to taking a basketball team and adding Charles Oakley). While this sounds like the concoction of an alcoholic chemist, it makes for truly delicious drinking. Here's how: fermentation in wine is the process by which yeast eat sugar, breaking it down into alcohol and carbon dioxide. When distilled spirits are added before the process is complete, it kills off the yeast, leaving more sugar than is found in a fully fermented wine and creating a sweeter tasting wine. Corollary benefit: fortified wines also have a higher alcohol content than table wines.

Some common examples of fortified wine are Madeira, Port and Sherry. As with so many other old world wines, these fortified wines are named after their regions of origin: Madeira comes from the Madeira Islands off the coasts of Europe and Africa in the Atlantic, Sherry comes from Jerez, Spain (Sherry is an English bastardization of Jerez), and Port is named after the city of Porto in Portugal (get it? Port? Clever).

New world wineries, however, do make wines in these styles and typically refer to their wines as Madeira, Sherry and Port. There is a vociferous debate surrounding whether new world wineries should be able to label their wines as such: the European Union states that only products from those regions can carry such labels, but common practice tends to ignore those rules. While the debate carries real significance for the marketers of those wines, it is purely academic for you, the wine drinker. Good Port is good Port, regardless of its origin; I have had great bottles come from not only Portugal, but also from Australia and the U.S.

When buying a port, you will see several different descriptors on the bottles, the most common of which are Tawny, Ruby and Vintage. Tawny ports are aged in barrels, which exposes them gradually to oxygen, resulting in a brownish tint to the wine. Further, contact with the wooden barrel gives Tawny Ports a slight nutty flavor. Tawny Ports are also slightly sweeter than most other forms of Port. Barrel-aging is a very expensive way to make wine, so be prepared to spend a bit more money for Tawny Port.

By contrast, Ruby Port is aged in stainless steel and concrete containers. This is great from a cost-savings perspective - cheap production methods for the winery make for inexpensive and accessible wine for you - but steel and concrete do nothing to enhance the character of a wine. That said, Ruby Port can still be a very enjoyable drink with great Port characteristics and I do not mean to turn you off to it.

The third common descriptor found on Port bottles is "Vintage Port." With table wine, all of the grapes in a wine were from a given year, or vintage. Port houses (the accepted term for Port wineries), however, often combine wines from different vintages. This is not a bad thing at all, but rather ensures consistency in a house's product from year to year. In years where exceptional weather creates fine grapes (roughly 3 times per decade), Port houses will declare a vintage and will create port from grapes harvested in that year alone. The rarity of vintage years, and the resulting scarcity of Vintage Port, means that you will pay handsomely to get your hands on these wines (I do economics like Adam Smith).

The bottle I chose the other night was Warre's Warrior (www.warre.com), from Portugal, which I found for about $18 at Belmont Beverage. Readers around the country should be able to find the Warrior at most upscale wine shops. Fun fact: Warrior is the world's oldest brand of Port, having been shipped under that label since the 1750's. While wine snobs would scoff at me for saying this, almost all Port tastes nearly the same to me: there is usually a plummy flavor that dominates, combined with spices and chocolate. The differences I find are in the levels of sweetness, intensity of flavor and length of finish, all of which the Warrior delivered on. Definitely a bottle that I would drink again.

For those of you open to exploring the wine world, Port is a great avenue to take, and the Warrior is a solid starting place. On the same side of that token, if any of you are looking to infuse your basketball teams with fortitude from external sources, Port is also a good option.

A Boarding Pass for Mr. Russell and a Tainted Bottle of Wine

Thanks to a good win on Thursday night against the Springfield Armor (coached by Dee Brown, who did not wear Reebok Pumps during the game and only twice buried his eyes in the crook of his arm like he was at the Slam Dunk Contest), we find our heroes at 10-16. Not insignificantly, we are 0-6 against the best team in the D-League - the Iowa Energy- and 10-10 against the rest of the league. Furthermore, even though we are 6 games below .500, we are only 3.5 games out of the playoffs. Looking at our team, we have four good big men, two decent wings, two very good shooting guards and a couple of scoring point guards. Our most glaring weakness is the lack of a true point guard; one that can control the tempo and get his teammates open shots.

We had that point guard last year in Walker Russell Jr., who set the D-League record for assists before traipsing off to Sophia, Bulgaria this year. To our surprise, his team released him two weeks ago because they ran out of money and we have obviously been on pins and needles ever since. We should find out in the next day or two whether he will indeed rejoin the team but he evidently has a big offer in China that he will likely take.

So, hoping against the odds that Walker will be on a plane headed back to Fort Wayne, I opened a bottle of Boarding Pass Shiraz from South Australia that I found for $18.99 at one of the nicer wine shops in town. For you Fort Wayners, the Belmont Beverage on Dupont has a nice selection and for those of you outside of Fort Wayne it should be available nearly nationwide at upscale wine shops. It is also important to note that the wine is a screw top. Much to Jaileer's chagrin (see his comments from my last blog), I am not going to fully address the magic of screw tops in this blog but rather I am going to discuss tainted wine, often referred to as "corked" wine. This is a massive subject, but it is incredibly important in the world of wine, so please bear with me.

When smelling wine, many descriptors are used: fruit, chocolate, soil, tobacco, cola, etc. Not often used are words such as wet cardboard, mold, and feet, even though these words can be just as accurate for some wines. These smells are typically present when an unopened bottle is tainted, making it unpleasant to smell and positively awful - though not harmful - to drink.

Wines are most often tainted by a cork coming into contact with a some sort of contaminant, causing the cork to produce TCA, which seeps into the wine (you will have to be satisfied with that explanation, as the chemistry behind TCA is entirely beyond my limited intellect). Wines can also become ruined by defective corks that allow air into the bottle, oxidizing the wine. Oxidation can also occur when wine is not stored on its side: with the wine not touching the cork, the cork dries out and shrinks just enough to allow oxygen to pass into the bottle. Screw tops are not immune to oxidation, as they can be dropped (or have something dropped on them), causing the seal to be broken and allowing air into the bottle.

Such was the case with the Boarding Pass Shiraz: the wine had an incredibly unpleasant nose, and once I smelled dirty socks I knew I needed to investigate further. True to my hunch, there was a small dent in the cap indicating that something had banged against the top of the bottle, breaking its airtight seal.

While all of this talk of smelly socks and wet cardboard is important, it is part of the broader issue of making sure that you, the wine consumer, do not get stuck paying for a spoiled bottle of wine. Between 5 and 10% of wine worldwide is tainted, meaning that as many as 1 in 10 bottles that you drink is spoiled. With that in mind, it is important for you to be vigilant in checking for tainted wine.

When ordering wine at a nice restaurant, a server will pour a small amount of wine in your glass before pouring the rest of the table. This is your opportunity to smell the wine to make sure that it is not spoiled. This is NOT an invitation to taste the wine to see if you like it, so for the love of God please do not taste the wine and then give your server a two thumbs up sign. In fact, if the wine is not tainted, then the server will fill the rest of your party's glasses before returning to fill yours, which is technically the first point at which you should drink your wine.

If, however, you suspect that the wine is tainted then you need to alert your server, who will either confirm it himself or will ask the sommelier for a second opinion (do not do this at TGI Friday's, as their servers have had the same amount of training in wine as I have had in nuclear physics). Regardless of their opinion, if you suspect the wine is tainted you should insist on a replacement bottle - though it must be the same wine you originally ordered. If you bought the wine at a store, you should return the bottle within 24 hours of opening it.

Do not let the restaurant or store clerk bully you into paying for a bottle that you believe to be tainted, as sending a wine back will not cost them any money. Once a bottle is sent back, the restaurant notifies their distributor who will replace the spoiled bottle. The distributor is also not out any money because they simply tell the winery and the winery will provide them with additional stock. Lest you fear that the winery is losing money on the deal, know that the winery has already built the cost of these tainted bottles into the price of the wine, meaning that it is ultimately the consumer who pays to insure the restaurant, distributor and winery against spoilage.

Knowing that, do you wonder why we support an industry that tolerates a 10% failure rate for its products? What if seat belt manufacturers were satisfied with their products working right only 90% of the time? Fortunately, some wineries are eschewing the tradition and romance of cork in favor of the significantly more reliable screw top, which I will address in a future blog.

In the meantime, I must get back to selling tickets and praying that Walker magically appears in a Mad Ants uniform.

Old World, New World and a Big Ass Bottle to Wash Away the Tears

When I started this blog three weeks ago, I said that I would be blogging within 24 hours of each of our games. A lofty goal, but one that I had stayed relatively true to through our first three games. Then came Wednesday's game, a game that saw the Mad Ants race out to a 26-point lead with six minutes left in the Third Quarter. With most teams - and by "most" I mean 98% of all teams at the pro, college, high school, junior high, and pee wee levels - such a large lead would be safe. The Mad Ants, however, have spent the better part of three seasons looking at such leads as a challenge - they know they'll find a way to give away the game, they just try to find novel avenues for doing so each time.

With such a bad taste in my mouth from the loss, and being tired of writing negative blogs about the team, I decided to wait until our weekend two-game set against Iowa to blog. Surely I'd have something positive to say about after those two games. We're bound to win one of them, right? Absolutely, positively, take-it-to-the-bank WRONG. We got destroyed in both games, including the Saturday game in which the nation again got to see us again on Versus.

So, with three straight losses fresh in my mind, I went to the store to grab the most fitting bottle I could find - a bottle of Gabbiano Chianti. What is significant about Gabbiano, you ask? Nothing, other than the fact that it was a large-format 1.5L bottle, and I had a lot of sorrows to drink away. A 1.5L bottle is often referred to as a Magnum, and contains two normal-sized bottles. At $11.99 for the Magnum, the Gabbiano Chianti was really a great buy. Not a ton going on either the nose or the palate, but it was really pleasant, and you certainly cannot expect much more than that from a wine that costs only $6/bottle (do the math with me!).

As non-descript as the wine may have been, it does bring up two interesting (to me, at least) talking points: the first is the bottle size, which deserves a bit more attention. Bottle size is an issue that very rarely becomes a factor in buying a wine. Of course if you have dinner guests - or are hiding from the fact that you sell tickets to a terrible basketball team - a Magnum is a convenient option. However, other even larger bottles do exist. These bottles are popular in the French regions of Bordeaux and Burgundy, each of which - typical of the French - find it necessary to have their own separate naming system for these large format bottles. Having lived in Burgundy I lean their direction and will therefore give you only the Burgundy names, all of which have Biblical significance. A 3.0L bottle (4 btl equivalent) is a Jeroboam, a 4.5L is a Rehoboam, a 6.0L bottle is a Methusalah, 9.0L bottle is a Salmanazer, a 12.0L bottle is a Balthasar and a 15.0L bottle (a whopping twenty bottle equivalent) is a Nebuchadnezzar. While impressing the wine-drinker is one reason for creating such large bottles, aging is another: the small amount of air in the bottle (between the cork and the wine) and a large amount of wine results in a small air-to-wine ratio, which favors slow development of the wine when compared with smaller formats.

The second significant element of the Gabbiano Chianti is the identification by region (Northern Italy) instead of by grape varietal, such as Cabernet Sauvignon or Merlot. Most Old World wines - i.e., wines made in Europe and the Mediterranean basin - are identified by region, whereas most New World wines - wines made in America, Australia/New Zealand, South Africa and South America - are identified by varietal. This makes shopping for New World wines fairly simple, and buying Old World wines quite complex. To successfully navigate Old World wines, it is necessary to know which regions grow which type of grapes. For example, wineries in Chianti use almost exclusively Sangiovese grapes. Listing the grape varieties grown in each Old World region is well beyond the scope of this blog, but a good reference site is www.bettertastingwine.com/appellation.html.

I have no doubt that I will revisit Old World v. New World topic in a later blog, so for now I will simply advise you to either research a region individually before buying a wine from that region, or dive right in a grab whatever bottle looks good! In the meantime, I will cross my fingers and hope that Jeff Potter can pull off some roster moves that will give us a New Team...

Two Vines for Two Faces

After the disappointing loss on Friday night to Sioux Falls, our heroes, the Mad Ants, turned around and beat the Skyforce handily on Saturday. As excited as I would normally get for a Mad Ants win, I have every confidence that the strength of the win was directly related to the game being broadcast nationwide on Versus. Although most of these guys are used to having played on CBS as collegians and you would think it would not be a big deal, they have just enough collective ego to act like tough guys in front of the cameras. Whatever the reason, I'll take the win.

As you can imagine, there is a large degree of frustration that comes with watching such uneven performances and so I chose a bottle of 2005 Columbia Crest Two Vines Chardonnay (http://www.columbiacrest.com/twoVines/release/198) from Washington State in honor of the two faces of this team. At $8.99 this wine was a steal. Truly a terrific bottle of wine for the money, and one for which I would have gladly paid upwards of $16. The wine had a very bright nose for a Chardonnay, which is fairly typical of Chards from Washington, with pear, honeysuckle, apple, candied lemon and caramel forming a very complex and delicious combination. All of these flavors transitioned nicely to the palate, where they turned into caramelized pear and pineapple, with caramel and toast lingering at length on the finish. Overall, I highly recommend this wine as an everyday wine.

That said, I do have an ax to grind with the marketing behind both the Two Vines and the 14 Hands that I reviewed yesterday. Both 14 Hands and Columbia Crest are part of the Chateau Ste. Michelle family of wines, with all of the above being owned by tobacco giant US Tobacco (a subsidiary of Altria Group, aka Philip Morris). That being the case, you can imagine that they have some pretty savvy marketers behind the brands, all of whom are doing whatever it takes to get you to buy these wines. I mean this with no offense to the CEO of Ch. Ste. Michelle, Ted Baseler - who is actually a family friend - but the marketing that they have done with these wines is so transparent as to be offensive.

Allow me to explain: I mentioned that these wines are from Washington State. This is these wines' "appellation". Wines are given an appellation based on where the grapes are grown. For example, if a wine is made exclusively from grapes grown in Napa Valley, the label will say Napa Valley on it. If, however, a wine is made from grapes sourced from a larger area than Napa Valley, then the label may say "Central Coast" or "California", depending on just how spread out the vineyards are.

An appellation is often very important to determine a wine's quality, as a winemaker and vineyard manager will have substantially more control over the quality of the grapes and the care that the grapes are given if he or she can go into the vineyard and personally inspect the grapes. As such, smaller and higher priced wineries often have more specific appellations, with some wines even having single vineyard appellations that denote that all of the grapes for a wine were picked from one vineyard. Massive wineries that sell wine in grocery stores nationwide rarely have that luxury and so are forced to fulfill their demand for grapes by sourcing them from vineyards over a large geographic area.

This in itself is not damning of a winery. However, the blurb on the back of both the Two Vines and 14 Hands both make bold and poetic proclamations about the tending of their vineyards that create a romantic image in the buyer's mind and infer that the wines come from quaint little vineyards. If this were the case, the wines' appellations would be "Walla Walla Valley" or "Columbia Valley" (which is a pretty massive appellation in itself). Instead, they are designated "Washington State" which means that the wineries did not get their grapes from any one vineyard, but rather sourced them from all over the state. Again, this is not a terrible thing in itself, but combined with their descriptions of the respective vineyards, the marketing is misleading at best and more accurately deceitful.

Offended or not, I still enjoyed this wine tremendously and would recommend it to all of you. Further, I got to enjoy it while basking in the glow of a Mad Ants victory! Let's see which of their two faces the Mad Ants wear next time.

14 Hands, and One Broken One

In honor of a weekend split with the Sioux Falls Skyforce, I tasted two wines last night and will be discussing them in two consecutive blogs. I wouldn't dare bore my (two) readers by breaking down two wines in the same column!

The first game I needed to pair a wine with was Friday night's loss. As anyone who follows the Mad Ants knows, losses are not a unique occurence with this franchise and so I needed to find something more specific on which to base my wine selection. Fortunately (or unfortunately if you are an Ants fan), our best scorer and emotional leader, Ron Howard, gave me inspiration by BREAKING HIS HAND in the closing minutes of our previous loss against Erie and will be out for 4-5 weeks. Ouch. Without Ron's 22.4 points and +18 efficiency rating we tumbled, losing 115-97 and giving up 36 points to Reggie Williams.

In honor of Ron's injury, and because I was in the mood for a Washington wine, I grabbed a bottle of 2007 14 Hands Cabernet Sauvignon for $11.99. Tasting this wine last night, I got to enjoy the company of my sister, Kelsey, who is in town from Seattle on business for the week. Kelsey and I worked together in the wine industry and she has incredibly sensitive taste buds, so if you think my tasting notes are particularly on point then you can give credit directly to her (or you can still give the credit to me and I will do my best to share it with her).

Regardless of the apportioning of credit, we thoroughly enjoyed breaking down (like Ron Howard's broken hand. Get it? No, seriously, get it?) this wine. The nose was powerful and very pleasant, with huge dark fruits like blackcurrant, fig and brandied cherries melding nicely with chocolate, sweet tobacco and a woodsy scent. The pallet, however, left much to be desired. It was very dark, with chocolate and smoke, but the fruit that was so heavy on the nose fell away like a Jeremy Richardson jump shot. The tannins were too pronounced, and Kelsey remarked that it "felt like swallowing sand." The only fruit left was on the finish, and that fruit was a combination of raisin and sour cherries.

A quick note about tannins. It is normal to have strong tannins in a young red wine. In fact, tannins will mellow with age, so these are normally indicative of a wine that will age well. However, as tannins become less aggressive with a wine's age, the fruitiness of a wine also diminishes. Therefore most wines that will age well carry a lot of fruit flavor when they are young; with this 14 Hands already lacking strong fruit, this wine will not age well. Being that the wine is not particularly good now, and is not likely to get better, I do not recommend the 14 Hands Cabernet.

Similarly, I would not recommend losing your top scorer for 4-5 weeks. Being an eternal optimist, I remarked to Coach Meyer that maybe there is a silver lining here and that our players could enjoy spreading the ball around more, resulting in more assists and a better flow to the offense. His look of scorn, combined with the resigned head shake, told me that I had better stick to selling tickets and sponsorships...

The First Vintage

I'm finally caving to the peer pressure. Jeff Potter and Garrett Martz - bloggers extraordinaire both, and two of my Mad Ants coworkers - have been on me for months to start a blog of my own, and here I now find myself in front of this screen, typing away. No turning back now!

With Jeff and Garrett's blogs focusing on inside information about the Mad Ants, I wanted to take a different tack, one that I can lend a bit of expertise to. While I know almost nothing about basketball (other than selling it), I do have an extensive background in wine. But how on Earth am I going to marry wine and basketball? Carefully, and only in print; I can assure you that none of our players are going to be pulling a Ron Artest any time soon.

My plan is this: within 24 hours of any Mad Ants game I will select a bottle of wine that seems to fit something significant from that game and I will publish tasting notes for that wine. I will try to focus on reasonably priced wines because a) I want them to be accessible to all of you (especially my public interest lawyer friends) and b) I'm buying these bottles myself and minor league sports is no lucrative venture!

Our last game was a miserable loss to Erie, in which we quickly turned a 94-90 lead into a 104-94 deficit through a string of terrible shots, Swiss cheese defense and sloppy play. The lone bright spot, however, was Oliver Lafayette who had 25 points in the first half and finished with 32. In honor of Oliver's performance - and despite his awful three pointer during a crucial point down the stretch and my belligerence in cursing out my computer as I watched it happen - I decided to open a bottle of Oliver Winery Zinfandel.

The wine itself is rather unremarkable but the interesting element is that while the winery itself is located in Bloomington, IN, the grapes from most of the winery's traditional varietals are imported from California and Washington. They do this because wines made from grapes grown in Indiana are, well, awful. There are many factors for that, including climate, soil quality and vineyard slope, among other things, but going into detail will only bore you (generously assuming that you are not already bored and are not only reading this far because you are family or friend). The bottom line is that you never want to drink a bottle of wine from Indiana unless you are doing so as a dare.

This particular Zinfandel is made from grapes grown in Lodi, California, home to many of California's best Zins. I am a huge fan of Zinfandel, with its rich body and massive bramble and plum flavors. While I appreciate almost any wine in the right situation - i.e., with the right meal - Zinfandel may be my favorite to drink on its own. It is easy to drink - though it is one of the highest alcohol content wines out there, which can result in the alcohol taste overpowering the fruitiness - and it is soft enough that you don't have to deal with sour-lemon-face induced by the tannins in so many Cabernet Sauvignons and Shiraz.

The Oliver Zin was drinkable, though a bit overpriced at $16-$18. Similarly overvalued was Oliver Lafayette's performance, as his 32 points and 4 assists did nothing to make his teammates better. Apparently he had a lapse where he forgot that the PG next to his name on the roster means he is supposed to pass the ball on occasion. Regardless, the Mad Ants fell to 8-12 and I got to enjoy an average bottle of wine. Things could be worse.