Mad Ants down by 1 with the ball and 1:30 left in the game. Rob Kurz drives the lane and gets hammered. No call. Sean Sonderleiter reaches in on the rebound and is whistled for a foul. In frustration, Rob protests the call emphatically, but in no way challenges the referee directly. Oversensitive referee calls a technical foul. Reno hits the technical free throw, then hits the two free throws from Sonderleiter's foul to go up 4. Momentum is lost and so is the game: Reno 94, Mad Ants 90. It has not been often in the past three years that referees' calls have directly cost us games, but this one was egregious in the extreme.
As frustrating as the call was, there is no better time for me to get a bit more in-depth about SCREW caps. When I last mentioned screw caps, I was discussing how some new world wineries are breaking away from the centuries-old practice of stopping wine bottles with cork by using alternative closures, such as screw caps or synthetic corks. This break from tradition is necessary because corks have a 5-10% failure rate, resulting in lost profits for wineries and higher prices for consumers (to offset those lost profits).
New world wineries, especially those in Australia and New Zealand, have been at the forefront of these changes for several years now because their cork failure rates are on average higher than any other wine-growing region in the world. This high failure rate is not a simple case of bad luck. Wine corks are made from cork trees grown primarily in Portugal and Sardinia, Italy, meaning that European wineries have the first opportunity to choose the best corks. American wineries then get to choose, followed by South African and South American wineries and finally Australian and New Zealand wineries. There are exceptions to this order where individual wineries have negotiated contracts with cork producers, but by and large Australia and NZ wineries get the short end of the stick. Having last pick at cork each year means that these wineries have failure rates hovering at 10% and above.
To overcome this disadvantage, winemakers in Australia began experimenting with screw caps well over ten years ago. While they found that screw caps greatly reduced their wines' failure rates, they ran into a whole new problem: wine consumers have for decades associated screw caps with cheap wines such as Boone's Farm and Thunderbird. Furthermore, they discovered that many consumers considered the romance of pulling a cork out of a bottle to be essential to enjoying a bottle of wine.
While these challenges have been daunting, they have not been insurmountable. The use of screw caps has spread across the New World and is now even discovering limited acceptance by some European wineries. Consumers are also beginning to embrace this new technology, as the confidence of knowing a bottle will not be tainted is beginning to outweigh the romance of using a corkscrew.
Still, there remains much distance to travel before screw tops are widely accepted, and there is still a very large question as to how wines age when under screw. Corks allow for a minute amount of air transfer as a wine ages, contributing to a wine "maturing." Screw caps, however, do not allow any air to pass into the wine, theoretically limiting the amount of maturing that can occur. Still, there has not been enough research done into this question to deliver a firm answer and many wineries appear willing to accept that risk.
I also mentioned another alternative closure - synthetic cork. A short while ago, before screw caps became all the rage, it appeared that synthetic cork would emerge as the alternative closure of choice for wineries. It was thought to have none of cork's failure issues, while still maintaining the romance of popping a cork. As time has passed, however, synthetic cork has proven to be more susceptible to wine taint than previously thought and consumers have been averse to plastic in their wine bottles.
With synthetic corks on the way out, and with more wineries adopting screw caps in lieu of natural cork every year, it appears that wine consumers will have no choice but to discard their prejudices against screw caps and learn to love twisting a bottle open instead of uncorking it.
As for me, I am going to get over my griping against the officiating and unscrew the cap on a bottle of appropriately named Bitch wine, a grenache from Australia.
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Monday, February 22, 2010
Old Vines and an Old Zag
Although the season has not gone exactly as planned, we had a welcome development the other day: Dan Dickau - he of the floppy hair and Gonzaga pedigree - signed with the D-League and we promptly traded Kyle McAlarney to the Springfield Armor for Dan's rights. Certainly Kyle was a favorite of our front office - a great kid and a mean 3-point shooter - but Dan is a floor general who can control the tempo of the game and has great court vision. Add in the veteran savvy that he has picked up over the course of 6 NBA seasons, and he has just the combination of skills we need to make the best of this team's talents. Sure enough, the first two games he started were decisive Mad Ants victories, coming in back-to-back games against the Erie Bayhawks.
In honor of Dan's arrival, I grabbed a bottle of 2006 Old Vine Zinfandel from the Klinker Brick Winery in Lodi, California - www.klinkerbrickwinery.com - at my new favorite bottle shop, Belmont Beverage, for about $16. The significance of this bottle is certainly not the Brick in the winery's name - which would be much more suitable if I was talking about our 2007 center, Larry Turner, instead of Dan. Rather, I chose this bottle because Dan's veteran savvy on the basketball court can be analogized to the complex characteristics that grapes grown on old vines contribute to a wine.
"Old vine" is a term used on wine labels to convey to the consumer that the grapes used for the wine were grown on mature vines. Most grape vines can live for 120 or so years, with their yields declining after the first 20 years. These declining yields make for not only smaller numbers of grapes, but smaller berries and fewer clusters, meaning more concentrated flavors, sugar and color. True to form, wines made from old vines are unbelievably good: they are rich and complex and make you feel like you should be chewing your wine instead of drinking it. Of course, less grapes per plant means less bottles produced means higher prices for you, so do not expect to pay less than $15 or so for old vine wines.
There are exceptions to that rule, and therein lies the problem with old vine wines: there are no legally defined specifications to determine what an "old vine" is. While most wineries seem to apply that term only when their vines are 50+ years old, certain shrewd (unscrupulous?) wineries have harnessed the growing consumer enthusiasm for old vine wines and have begun to apply that term to wines that are from significantly younger vines and do not have old vine characteristics. Unfortunately, as consumers we do not have many protections against purchasing these faux old vine wines. The best tips I can give are to 1) avoid large wineries with sophisticated marketing departments and 2) if a winery produces two or more zinfandels and they have an old vine zinfandel listed separately in their product line, then you should be safe.
In honor of Dan's arrival, I grabbed a bottle of 2006 Old Vine Zinfandel from the Klinker Brick Winery in Lodi, California - www.klinkerbrickwinery.com - at my new favorite bottle shop, Belmont Beverage, for about $16. The significance of this bottle is certainly not the Brick in the winery's name - which would be much more suitable if I was talking about our 2007 center, Larry Turner, instead of Dan. Rather, I chose this bottle because Dan's veteran savvy on the basketball court can be analogized to the complex characteristics that grapes grown on old vines contribute to a wine.
"Old vine" is a term used on wine labels to convey to the consumer that the grapes used for the wine were grown on mature vines. Most grape vines can live for 120 or so years, with their yields declining after the first 20 years. These declining yields make for not only smaller numbers of grapes, but smaller berries and fewer clusters, meaning more concentrated flavors, sugar and color. True to form, wines made from old vines are unbelievably good: they are rich and complex and make you feel like you should be chewing your wine instead of drinking it. Of course, less grapes per plant means less bottles produced means higher prices for you, so do not expect to pay less than $15 or so for old vine wines.
There are exceptions to that rule, and therein lies the problem with old vine wines: there are no legally defined specifications to determine what an "old vine" is. While most wineries seem to apply that term only when their vines are 50+ years old, certain shrewd (unscrupulous?) wineries have harnessed the growing consumer enthusiasm for old vine wines and have begun to apply that term to wines that are from significantly younger vines and do not have old vine characteristics. Unfortunately, as consumers we do not have many protections against purchasing these faux old vine wines. The best tips I can give are to 1) avoid large wineries with sophisticated marketing departments and 2) if a winery produces two or more zinfandels and they have an old vine zinfandel listed separately in their product line, then you should be safe.
As for the Klinker Brick, it was definitely in the category of Legitimate Old Vine Zinfandel. Deep color, huge nose and a finish that seemed to carry on for days. If you want to get a feel for old vine zinfandel at its best - and at an affordable price - this wine is a great option.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Cold as Ice
Another loss the other night to Rio Grande Valley. Like Iowa, they are unreasonably good, so I was not particularly depressed at the outcome. The rough part of this game, rather, was that a winter storm descended upon Fort Wayne, causing radio stations to say things like, "there is nothing going on tonight that you should be on the roads for. Stay home." Perfect. Thanks for that. Fortunately, we still had quite a few hardy souls who braved the weather to get to the Coliseum to see RGV systematically dismantle us.
Result and crowd aside, the brutal weather inspired me to write about a wine that holds a very unique niche in the wine world: ice wine. Ice wine is a member of the dessert wine family, along with late harvest wines, botrytis wines and an assortment of other wines with a high residual sugar (the sugar left in the wine after fermentation) content. All of these wines are delicious when served as dessert, but ice wine is particularly coveted by wine drinkers.
Ice wine is made when white grapes (often Vidal grapes) are left on the vine until the first hard freeze occurs, sometimes several weeks or even several months after other grapes are harvested. Two major things occur when grapes are left on the vines so long. First, ripening grapes produce sugar, meaning that the longer the grapes are left on the vine, the higher their sugar content. This is why "late harvest" wines are also classified as dessert wines. Second, and more unique to ice wines, the hard freeze causes all of the water in the grape to freeze, meaning that pressing the grapes produces a more concentrated juice that is akin to liquid sugar.
As simple and romantic as that explanation is, the truth is that producing ice wine is fraught with financial peril for the winemaker. If a freeze does not come soon enough, the grapes may rot on the vine, meaning the potential loss of an entire vintage for a winery. Of course, as with wineries that use cork, the risk of loss is passed along to you in the form of outrageous prices for many ice wines. Indignation aside, I believe that ice wines are worth every penny and I will go out of my way to get my hands on them.
Although I have not yet blogged much about wine and food pairing, it is important to highlight my comment from the opening paragraph that sweet wines are delicious when served as dessert. Sweet wines are a great way to wash down a meal, but their sweetness does not make for good pairing with sweet desserts. The combination of residual sugar, naturally sweet alcohol and acidity ends up clashing with the dessert's sweetness and neither the wine nor the dessert will show their best.
Result and crowd aside, the brutal weather inspired me to write about a wine that holds a very unique niche in the wine world: ice wine. Ice wine is a member of the dessert wine family, along with late harvest wines, botrytis wines and an assortment of other wines with a high residual sugar (the sugar left in the wine after fermentation) content. All of these wines are delicious when served as dessert, but ice wine is particularly coveted by wine drinkers.
Ice wine is made when white grapes (often Vidal grapes) are left on the vine until the first hard freeze occurs, sometimes several weeks or even several months after other grapes are harvested. Two major things occur when grapes are left on the vines so long. First, ripening grapes produce sugar, meaning that the longer the grapes are left on the vine, the higher their sugar content. This is why "late harvest" wines are also classified as dessert wines. Second, and more unique to ice wines, the hard freeze causes all of the water in the grape to freeze, meaning that pressing the grapes produces a more concentrated juice that is akin to liquid sugar.
As simple and romantic as that explanation is, the truth is that producing ice wine is fraught with financial peril for the winemaker. If a freeze does not come soon enough, the grapes may rot on the vine, meaning the potential loss of an entire vintage for a winery. Of course, as with wineries that use cork, the risk of loss is passed along to you in the form of outrageous prices for many ice wines. Indignation aside, I believe that ice wines are worth every penny and I will go out of my way to get my hands on them.
Although I have not yet blogged much about wine and food pairing, it is important to highlight my comment from the opening paragraph that sweet wines are delicious when served as dessert. Sweet wines are a great way to wash down a meal, but their sweetness does not make for good pairing with sweet desserts. The combination of residual sugar, naturally sweet alcohol and acidity ends up clashing with the dessert's sweetness and neither the wine nor the dessert will show their best.
Monday, February 8, 2010
Any Port in a Storm
Remember how I said in my last blog that we are 0-6 against Iowa? Make it 0-7. Iowa is good - and by "good" I mean they could beat the Nets and the Bobcats right now. Still, I was expecting us to show a little grit and win at least one of those seven. No such luck. Instead, we now sit at 10-17, hoping to climb back into the playoff picture.
After witnessing our lack of fortitude the past several games, I decided to search for solace in one of my favorite types of wine: Port. Port is a fortified wine, meaning that it has distilled spirits added to it (roughly equivalent to taking a basketball team and adding Charles Oakley). While this sounds like the concoction of an alcoholic chemist, it makes for truly delicious drinking. Here's how: fermentation in wine is the process by which yeast eat sugar, breaking it down into alcohol and carbon dioxide. When distilled spirits are added before the process is complete, it kills off the yeast, leaving more sugar than is found in a fully fermented wine and creating a sweeter tasting wine. Corollary benefit: fortified wines also have a higher alcohol content than table wines.
New world wineries, however, do make wines in these styles and typically refer to their wines as Madeira, Sherry and Port. There is a vociferous debate surrounding whether new world wineries should be able to label their wines as such: the European Union states that only products from those regions can carry such labels, but common practice tends to ignore those rules. While the debate carries real significance for the marketers of those wines, it is purely academic for you, the wine drinker. Good Port is good Port, regardless of its origin; I have had great bottles come from not only Portugal, but also from Australia and the U.S.
When buying a port, you will see several different descriptors on the bottles, the most common of which are Tawny, Ruby and Vintage. Tawny ports are aged in barrels, which exposes them gradually to oxygen, resulting in a brownish tint to the wine. Further, contact with the wooden barrel gives Tawny Ports a slight nutty flavor. Tawny Ports are also slightly sweeter than most other forms of Port. Barrel-aging is a very expensive way to make wine, so be prepared to spend a bit more money for Tawny Port.
By contrast, Ruby Port is aged in stainless steel and concrete containers. This is great from a cost-savings perspective - cheap production methods for the winery make for inexpensive and accessible wine for you - but steel and concrete do nothing to enhance the character of a wine. That said, Ruby Port can still be a very enjoyable drink with great Port characteristics and I do not mean to turn you off to it.
The third common descriptor found on Port bottles is "Vintage Port." With table wine, all of the grapes in a wine were from a given year, or vintage. Port houses (the accepted term for Port wineries), however, often combine wines from different vintages. This is not a bad thing at all, but rather ensures consistency in a house's product from year to year. In years where exceptional weather creates fine grapes (roughly 3 times per decade), Port houses will declare a vintage and will create port from grapes harvested in that year alone. The rarity of vintage years, and the resulting scarcity of Vintage Port, means that you will pay handsomely to get your hands on these wines (I do economics like Adam Smith).
The bottle I chose the other night was Warre's Warrior (www.warre.com), from Portugal, which I found for about $18 at Belmont Beverage. Readers around the country should be able to find the Warrior at most upscale wine shops. Fun fact: Warrior is the world's oldest brand of Port, having been shipped under that label since the 1750's. While wine snobs would scoff at me for saying this, almost all Port tastes nearly the same to me: there is usually a plummy flavor that dominates, combined with spices and chocolate. The differences I find are in the levels of sweetness, intensity of flavor and length of finish, all of which the Warrior delivered on. Definitely a bottle that I would drink again.
For those of you open to exploring the wine world, Port is a great avenue to take, and the Warrior is a solid starting place. On the same side of that token, if any of you are looking to infuse your basketball teams with fortitude from external sources, Port is also a good option.
Monday, February 1, 2010
A Boarding Pass for Mr. Russell and a Tainted Bottle of Wine
Thanks to a good win on Thursday night against the Springfield Armor (coached by Dee Brown, who did not wear Reebok Pumps during the game and only twice buried his eyes in the crook of his arm like he was at the Slam Dunk Contest), we find our heroes at 10-16. Not insignificantly, we are 0-6 against the best team in the D-League - the Iowa Energy- and 10-10 against the rest of the league. Furthermore, even though we are 6 games below .500, we are only 3.5 games out of the playoffs. Looking at our team, we have four good big men, two decent wings, two very good shooting guards and a couple of scoring point guards. Our most glaring weakness is the lack of a true point guard; one that can control the tempo and get his teammates open shots.
We had that point guard last year in Walker Russell Jr., who set the D-League record for assists before traipsing off to Sophia, Bulgaria this year. To our surprise, his team released him two weeks ago because they ran out of money and we have obviously been on pins and needles ever since. We should find out in the next day or two whether he will indeed rejoin the team but he evidently has a big offer in China that he will likely take.
So, hoping against the odds that Walker will be on a plane headed back to Fort Wayne, I opened a bottle of Boarding Pass Shiraz from South Australia that I found for $18.99 at one of the nicer wine shops in town. For you Fort Wayners, the Belmont Beverage on Dupont has a nice selection and for those of you outside of Fort Wayne it should be available nearly nationwide at upscale wine shops. It is also important to note that the wine is a screw top. Much to Jaileer's chagrin (see his comments from my last blog), I am not going to fully address the magic of screw tops in this blog but rather I am going to discuss tainted wine, often referred to as "corked" wine. This is a massive subject, but it is incredibly important in the world of wine, so please bear with me.
When smelling wine, many descriptors are used: fruit, chocolate, soil, tobacco, cola, etc. Not often used are words such as wet cardboard, mold, and feet, even though these words can be just as accurate for some wines. These smells are typically present when an unopened bottle is tainted, making it unpleasant to smell and positively awful - though not harmful - to drink.
Wines are most often tainted by a cork coming into contact with a some sort of contaminant, causing the cork to produce TCA, which seeps into the wine (you will have to be satisfied with that explanation, as the chemistry behind TCA is entirely beyond my limited intellect). Wines can also become ruined by defective corks that allow air into the bottle, oxidizing the wine. Oxidation can also occur when wine is not stored on its side: with the wine not touching the cork, the cork dries out and shrinks just enough to allow oxygen to pass into the bottle. Screw tops are not immune to oxidation, as they can be dropped (or have something dropped on them), causing the seal to be broken and allowing air into the bottle.
Such was the case with the Boarding Pass Shiraz: the wine had an incredibly unpleasant nose, and once I smelled dirty socks I knew I needed to investigate further. True to my hunch, there was a small dent in the cap indicating that something had banged against the top of the bottle, breaking its airtight seal.
While all of this talk of smelly socks and wet cardboard is important, it is part of the broader issue of making sure that you, the wine consumer, do not get stuck paying for a spoiled bottle of wine. Between 5 and 10% of wine worldwide is tainted, meaning that as many as 1 in 10 bottles that you drink is spoiled. With that in mind, it is important for you to be vigilant in checking for tainted wine.
When ordering wine at a nice restaurant, a server will pour a small amount of wine in your glass before pouring the rest of the table. This is your opportunity to smell the wine to make sure that it is not spoiled. This is NOT an invitation to taste the wine to see if you like it, so for the love of God please do not taste the wine and then give your server a two thumbs up sign. In fact, if the wine is not tainted, then the server will fill the rest of your party's glasses before returning to fill yours, which is technically the first point at which you should drink your wine.
If, however, you suspect that the wine is tainted then you need to alert your server, who will either confirm it himself or will ask the sommelier for a second opinion (do not do this at TGI Friday's, as their servers have had the same amount of training in wine as I have had in nuclear physics). Regardless of their opinion, if you suspect the wine is tainted you should insist on a replacement bottle - though it must be the same wine you originally ordered. If you bought the wine at a store, you should return the bottle within 24 hours of opening it.
Do not let the restaurant or store clerk bully you into paying for a bottle that you believe to be tainted, as sending a wine back will not cost them any money. Once a bottle is sent back, the restaurant notifies their distributor who will replace the spoiled bottle. The distributor is also not out any money because they simply tell the winery and the winery will provide them with additional stock. Lest you fear that the winery is losing money on the deal, know that the winery has already built the cost of these tainted bottles into the price of the wine, meaning that it is ultimately the consumer who pays to insure the restaurant, distributor and winery against spoilage.
Knowing that, do you wonder why we support an industry that tolerates a 10% failure rate for its products? What if seat belt manufacturers were satisfied with their products working right only 90% of the time? Fortunately, some wineries are eschewing the tradition and romance of cork in favor of the significantly more reliable screw top, which I will address in a future blog.
In the meantime, I must get back to selling tickets and praying that Walker magically appears in a Mad Ants uniform.
We had that point guard last year in Walker Russell Jr., who set the D-League record for assists before traipsing off to Sophia, Bulgaria this year. To our surprise, his team released him two weeks ago because they ran out of money and we have obviously been on pins and needles ever since. We should find out in the next day or two whether he will indeed rejoin the team but he evidently has a big offer in China that he will likely take.
So, hoping against the odds that Walker will be on a plane headed back to Fort Wayne, I opened a bottle of Boarding Pass Shiraz from South Australia that I found for $18.99 at one of the nicer wine shops in town. For you Fort Wayners, the Belmont Beverage on Dupont has a nice selection and for those of you outside of Fort Wayne it should be available nearly nationwide at upscale wine shops. It is also important to note that the wine is a screw top. Much to Jaileer's chagrin (see his comments from my last blog), I am not going to fully address the magic of screw tops in this blog but rather I am going to discuss tainted wine, often referred to as "corked" wine. This is a massive subject, but it is incredibly important in the world of wine, so please bear with me.
When smelling wine, many descriptors are used: fruit, chocolate, soil, tobacco, cola, etc. Not often used are words such as wet cardboard, mold, and feet, even though these words can be just as accurate for some wines. These smells are typically present when an unopened bottle is tainted, making it unpleasant to smell and positively awful - though not harmful - to drink.
Wines are most often tainted by a cork coming into contact with a some sort of contaminant, causing the cork to produce TCA, which seeps into the wine (you will have to be satisfied with that explanation, as the chemistry behind TCA is entirely beyond my limited intellect). Wines can also become ruined by defective corks that allow air into the bottle, oxidizing the wine. Oxidation can also occur when wine is not stored on its side: with the wine not touching the cork, the cork dries out and shrinks just enough to allow oxygen to pass into the bottle. Screw tops are not immune to oxidation, as they can be dropped (or have something dropped on them), causing the seal to be broken and allowing air into the bottle.
Such was the case with the Boarding Pass Shiraz: the wine had an incredibly unpleasant nose, and once I smelled dirty socks I knew I needed to investigate further. True to my hunch, there was a small dent in the cap indicating that something had banged against the top of the bottle, breaking its airtight seal.
While all of this talk of smelly socks and wet cardboard is important, it is part of the broader issue of making sure that you, the wine consumer, do not get stuck paying for a spoiled bottle of wine. Between 5 and 10% of wine worldwide is tainted, meaning that as many as 1 in 10 bottles that you drink is spoiled. With that in mind, it is important for you to be vigilant in checking for tainted wine.
When ordering wine at a nice restaurant, a server will pour a small amount of wine in your glass before pouring the rest of the table. This is your opportunity to smell the wine to make sure that it is not spoiled. This is NOT an invitation to taste the wine to see if you like it, so for the love of God please do not taste the wine and then give your server a two thumbs up sign. In fact, if the wine is not tainted, then the server will fill the rest of your party's glasses before returning to fill yours, which is technically the first point at which you should drink your wine.
If, however, you suspect that the wine is tainted then you need to alert your server, who will either confirm it himself or will ask the sommelier for a second opinion (do not do this at TGI Friday's, as their servers have had the same amount of training in wine as I have had in nuclear physics). Regardless of their opinion, if you suspect the wine is tainted you should insist on a replacement bottle - though it must be the same wine you originally ordered. If you bought the wine at a store, you should return the bottle within 24 hours of opening it.
Do not let the restaurant or store clerk bully you into paying for a bottle that you believe to be tainted, as sending a wine back will not cost them any money. Once a bottle is sent back, the restaurant notifies their distributor who will replace the spoiled bottle. The distributor is also not out any money because they simply tell the winery and the winery will provide them with additional stock. Lest you fear that the winery is losing money on the deal, know that the winery has already built the cost of these tainted bottles into the price of the wine, meaning that it is ultimately the consumer who pays to insure the restaurant, distributor and winery against spoilage.
Knowing that, do you wonder why we support an industry that tolerates a 10% failure rate for its products? What if seat belt manufacturers were satisfied with their products working right only 90% of the time? Fortunately, some wineries are eschewing the tradition and romance of cork in favor of the significantly more reliable screw top, which I will address in a future blog.
In the meantime, I must get back to selling tickets and praying that Walker magically appears in a Mad Ants uniform.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)